What are the consequences if the people given control over our government have no idea how it works?
"The election happened," remembers Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, then deputy secretary of the Department of Energy. "And then there was radio silence." Across all departments, similar stories were playing out: Trump appointees were few and far between; those that did show up were shockingly uninformed about the functions of their new workplace. Some even threw away the briefing books that had been prepared for them.
Michael Lewis’s brilliant narrative takes us into the engine rooms of a government under attack by its own leaders. In Agriculture the funding of vital programs like food stamps and school lunches is being slashed. The Commerce Department may not have enough staff to conduct the 2020 Census properly. Over at Energy, where international nuclear risk is managed, it’s not clear there will be enough inspectors to track and locate black market uranium before terrorists do.
Willful ignorance plays a role in these looming disasters. If your ambition is to maximize short-term gains without regard to the long-term cost, you are better off not knowing those costs. If you want to preserve your personal immunity to the hard problems, it’s better never to really understand those problems. There is upside to ignorance, and downside to knowledge. Knowledge makes life messier. It makes it a bit more difficult for a person who wishes to shrink the world to a worldview.
If there are dangerous fools in this book, there are also heroes, unsung, of course. They are the linchpins of the system―those public servants whose knowledge, dedication, and proactivity keep the machinery running. Michael Lewis finds them, and he asks them what keeps them up at night.
##美國政治角力的本質,往往不是驢象之爭,而是逐利和逐夢者之爭。作者寫到農業部的時候開始陷入瞭一種固定範式:高效部門被架空、優秀團隊被罷黜、有益項目被取締,Trump與Obama和Bush政權相比有諸多不妥。但是循規蹈矩其實未必穩妥,異於前任未必倒退,我反而覺得Trump團隊最大的過錯在於錶象溝通時的傲慢和冷漠。一切問題都會透過溝通暴露,溝通不當,一切便都是問題。讀完全書,最精華的論點在DOE一章最後,守序的邪惡與無知是第五類風險的本源,要比大眾視野下的混亂善意可怕的多:犧牲長期利益,而試圖通過program management填補短期的漏洞,這纔是一個政治體製倒退的深層原因。
評分##有點意思
評分##有點意思
評分##19#09 終於等到瞭Michael Lewis的新書,但是讀起來遠沒有之前的作品有意思,第三章的最後一個故事我更是在抱娃睡覺的睏倦中忍無可忍地索性跳過瞭。這一方麵是題材的問題:本作講的不是金融圈的光怪陸離,而是(在黑川普的底色下)講述瞭美國政治係統的成就、問題和隱憂。另一方麵,本作與前作之前的差異也是立場上的:無論是Liar's Poker, The Big Short還是Flash Boys,Lewis都是站在“全球性正確”的立場(中小投資者保護是其中重要的一點)上針砭金融界公認的弊端,嬉笑怒罵暢快淋灕;但本作立場局限於美國國內政治中的一派,是非麯直外人既無共鳴,又難判斷。盡管如此,讀後確實對美國政府一些部門的具體工作有瞭更深的認識。
評分##可讀性很強
評分##Enlightening. 對美國聯邦政府職能的認知被翻新瞭
評分##結構比較鬆散 花樣黑Trump 故事本身還都是頗值得一讀的
評分##簡明扼要的從democratic establishment的角度闡述瞭三個問題:管核武器靠科學,美國農村要遭殃因為淳樸的USDA都不喜歡Trump people,颶風路綫很隨機預測天氣還得靠衛星但是大數據還是nb
評分##語音書到手,罵川普的,也就這本值得一讀。雖然有流水賬之嫌,不過,作者呈現的黯淡現實真讓理想主義者寒心。嫌內容少的讀者有些吹毛求疵,川普去年初就職,作者在一年多時間完成采訪撰寫,寫瞭三個主要部門的問題,已經很不易瞭。為敘述風格加一星,顯然為瞭中期選舉匆忙完成的。錶麵上反對川普,實際批判這種造就川普的政治環境和那些無視或無知於政府職能的選民們。即使共和黨失去多數地位,風險長期存在,美國的政治氣氛和意識形態纔是問題癥結所在,川普隻是開始。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.cndgn.com All Rights Reserved. 新城书站 版權所有