发表于2025-02-25
Daniel P. Friedman is Professor of Computer Science in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering at Indiana University and is the author of many books published by the MIT Press, including The Little Schemer and The Seasoned Schemer (with Matthias Felleisen); The Little Prover (with Carl Eastlund); and The Reasoned Schemer (with William E. Byrd, Oleg Kiselyov, and Jason Hemann).
An introduction to dependent types, demonstrating the most beautiful aspects, one step at a time. A program's type describes its behavior. Dependent types are a first-class part of a language, and are much more powerful than other kinds of types; using just one language for types and programs allows program descriptions to be as powerful as the programs they describe. The Little Typer explains dependent types, beginning with a very small language that looks very much like Scheme and extending it to cover both programming with dependent types and using dependent types for mathematical reasoning. Readers should be familiar with the basics of a Lisp-like programming language, as presented in the first four chapters of The Little Schemer. The first five chapters of The Little Typer provide the needed tools to understand dependent types; the remaining chapters use these tools to build a bridge between mathematics and programming. Readers will learn that tools they know from programming-pairs, lists, functions, and recursions-can also capture patterns of reasoning. The Little Typer does not attempt to teach either practical programming skills or a fully rigorous approach to type. Instead, it demonstrates the most beautiful aspects as simply as possible, one step at a time.
The Little Typer 下载 mobi pdf epub txt 电子书 格式 2025
The Little Typer 下载 mobi epub pdf 电子书##在看前面几章,犹如在看哲学书,尽是一些毫无意义的定义,满是一些脱裤子放屁的做法。 说是不能用recursion写function,那还玩个屁,于是强行定义了个iter-nat来用,可iter-nat他妈不recursive吗,最后出个rec-nat...再强加解释说这样做有什么什么好处好自圆其说,跟哲学家一个德行。Friedman的书很多都很喜欢,不过这本书讲述的理论,似乎不太行。放弃。
评分##在看前面几章,犹如在看哲学书,尽是一些毫无意义的定义,满是一些脱裤子放屁的做法。 说是不能用recursion写function,那还玩个屁,于是强行定义了个iter-nat来用,可iter-nat他妈不recursive吗,最后出个rec-nat...再强加解释说这样做有什么什么好处好自圆其说,跟哲学家一个德行。Friedman的书很多都很喜欢,不过这本书讲述的理论,似乎不太行。放弃。
评分##在看前面几章,犹如在看哲学书,尽是一些毫无意义的定义,满是一些脱裤子放屁的做法。 说是不能用recursion写function,那还玩个屁,于是强行定义了个iter-nat来用,可iter-nat他妈不recursive吗,最后出个rec-nat...再强加解释说这样做有什么什么好处好自圆其说,跟哲学家一个德行。Friedman的书很多都很喜欢,不过这本书讲述的理论,似乎不太行。放弃。
评分 评分##在看前面几章,犹如在看哲学书,尽是一些毫无意义的定义,满是一些脱裤子放屁的做法。 说是不能用recursion写function,那还玩个屁,于是强行定义了个iter-nat来用,可iter-nat他妈不recursive吗,最后出个rec-nat...再强加解释说这样做有什么什么好处好自圆其说,跟哲学家一个德行。Friedman的书很多都很喜欢,不过这本书讲述的理论,似乎不太行。放弃。
评分##最终还是迷失在iter-Cap, rec-Cap, ind-Cap中了。
评分##在看前面几章,犹如在看哲学书,尽是一些毫无意义的定义,满是一些脱裤子放屁的做法。 说是不能用recursion写function,那还玩个屁,于是强行定义了个iter-nat来用,可iter-nat他妈不recursive吗,最后出个rec-nat...再强加解释说这样做有什么什么好处好自圆其说,跟哲学家一个德行。Friedman的书很多都很喜欢,不过这本书讲述的理论,似乎不太行。放弃。
The Little Typer mobi epub pdf txt 电子书 格式下载 2025