发表于2025-03-03
Tonio Andrade is professor of history at Emory University and the author of Lost Colony: The Untold Story of China’s First Great Victory over the West (Princeton) and How Taiwan Became Chinese.
The Chinese invented gunpowder and began exploring its military uses as early as the 900s, four centuries before the technology passed to the West. But by the early 1800s, China had fallen so far behind the West in gunpowder warfare that it was easily defeated by Britain in the Opium War of 1839–42. What happened? In The Gunpowder Age, Tonio Andrade offers a compelling new answer, opening a fresh perspective on a key question of world history: why did the countries of western Europe surge to global importance starting in the 1500s while China slipped behind?
Historians have long argued that gunpowder weapons helped Europeans establish global hegemony. Yet the inhabitants of what is today China not only invented guns and bombs but also, as Andrade shows, continued to innovate in gunpowder technology through the early 1700s—much longer than previously thought. Why, then, did China become so vulnerable? Andrade argues that one significant reason is that it was out of practice fighting wars, having enjoyed nearly a century of relative peace, since 1760. Indeed, he demonstrates that China—like Europe—was a powerful military innovator, particularly during times of great warfare, such as the violent century starting after the Opium War, when the Chinese once again quickly modernized their forces. Today, China is simply returning to its old position as one of the world’s great military powers.
By showing that China’s military dynamism was deeper, longer lasting, and more quickly recovered than previously understood, The Gunpowder Age challenges long-standing explanations of the so-called Great Divergence between the West and Asia.
The Gunpowder Age 下载 mobi pdf epub txt 电子书 格式 2025
The Gunpowder Age 下载 mobi epub pdf 电子书##处所谓“中心”者反思欧洲中心主义最甚,此书廓清一个重要观点:“任何情况下,军事现代化的动力都不该狭隘地理解为西方化”。书从宋朝讲起,至于大清帝国覆灭,以火器战争为中心视野贯穿,视其为历史发展的重要推动力。近代中国之落后西方——所谓“大分流”,认为最大缘由在...
评分 评分或许初始期望太高,读完发现提出问题和试探多于解释,更适合做教科书。军事大分流的说法很有趣,相对平行的军事技术和作战模式比较,尤其是几次欧洲与亚洲势力交锋也颇有趣,分流在18世纪中叶(所谓盛清和平期)也恰与彭慕兰说法对证。不过两个主要论点——无多国/多政体体系则无战争、无战争则无威胁、无威胁则无进步(一系列战争与国家形成文献),盛清一统安靖导致军事革新需求消失;科学/技术与科技群体的独立发展对军事革新的促进作用(李约瑟等?)——似已经被反复论述过,并无什么出色之处。欧洲船只更先进更抗风浪、欧洲中世纪堡垒城墙较薄但允许火药武器开火还击,确乎为重要优势,且也在无形中促进火药武器发展和军队远征与后勤编组进步,然欧陆多国战争恰使其非铁板一块,前者仅为少数海权国拥有、后者则并未在远征中体现。
评分或许初始期望太高,读完发现提出问题和试探多于解释,更适合做教科书。军事大分流的说法很有趣,相对平行的军事技术和作战模式比较,尤其是几次欧洲与亚洲势力交锋也颇有趣,分流在18世纪中叶(所谓盛清和平期)也恰与彭慕兰说法对证。不过两个主要论点——无多国/多政体体系则无战争、无战争则无威胁、无威胁则无进步(一系列战争与国家形成文献),盛清一统安靖导致军事革新需求消失;科学/技术与科技群体的独立发展对军事革新的促进作用(李约瑟等?)——似已经被反复论述过,并无什么出色之处。欧洲船只更先进更抗风浪、欧洲中世纪堡垒城墙较薄但允许火药武器开火还击,确乎为重要优势,且也在无形中促进火药武器发展和军队远征与后勤编组进步,然欧陆多国战争恰使其非铁板一块,前者仅为少数海权国拥有、后者则并未在远征中体现。
评分 评分##中国人发明了火药,但只是用来庆祝新年和节日,西方人受到启发,发明了火炮,进而展开对异域的殖民扩张——类似的看法或陈见,不仅见诸以鲁迅代表的“新文化运动”主将笔下,也在不少国内外学者当中蔓延,以至于成为了某种集体无意识;暂且不论前者与后者的不同,特别是其产生...
评分 评分##作者做了大量功课(引用丰富资料)来研究火炮时代以中国为代表的东亚(也包括日本和朝鲜)与欧洲在使用火炮方面的优劣。 中国在宋朝即有使用火器的记载,元末明初中国率先进入火药时代。由于中国城墙普遍高大坚固,火器难以撼动,因此火器偏重小型化和人员杀伤,而欧洲城墙相对...
评分##世界历史届一直有一个 Great Divergence Debate(大分流)的讨论,其中中心就是中国相对于欧洲是在什么时候、如何衰落的。其中一个分支问题就是中国的军事衰落是何时、如何发生的呢? 这本书提供了一部分答案: 1. 尽管很多人说明朝郑和下西洋的终结和明朝的闭关锁国是中国开始...
The Gunpowder Age mobi epub pdf txt 电子书 格式下载 2025