Getting in is only half the battle. The Privileged Poor reveals how―and why―disadvantaged students struggle at elite colleges, and explains what schools can do differently if these students are to thrive.
The Ivy League looks different than it used to. College presidents and deans of admission have opened their doors―and their coffers―to support a more diverse student body. But is it enough just to admit these students? In The Privileged Poor, Anthony Jack reveals that the struggles of less privileged students continue long after they’ve arrived on campus. Admission, they quickly learn, is not the same as acceptance. This bracing and necessary book documents how university policies and cultures can exacerbate preexisting inequalities and reveals why these policies hit some students harder than others.
Despite their lofty aspirations, top colleges hedge their bets by recruiting their new diversity largely from the same old sources, admitting scores of lower-income black, Latino, and white undergraduates from elite private high schools like Exeter and Andover. These students approach campus life very differently from students who attended local, and typically troubled, public high schools and are often left to flounder on their own. Drawing on interviews with dozens of undergraduates at one of America’s most famous colleges and on his own experiences as one of the privileged poor, Jack describes the lives poor students bring with them and shows how powerfully background affects their chances of success.
If we truly want our top colleges to be engines of opportunity, university policies and campus cultures will have to change. Jack provides concrete advice to help schools reduce these hidden disadvantages―advice we cannot afford to ignore.
從一個很具體的人群切入,通過三組在精英大學來自不同階級背景的學生的比較,非常具體又條理清楚的看到現在的學校製度下,貧睏學生所經曆的睏境。很多意在幫助他們的措施也可能是進一步強化差異,沒有考慮到心理層麵帶給學生的感受。階級和教育題材書籍中的又一塊磚。
評分##淺嘗輒止,有點可惜。
評分##主要提齣瞭poor students大類裏有細分的privileged poor的概念。這些privileged poor因為高中時期進入瞭更為精英和高層的環境,在進入精英大學之後與peer和校裏的adults溝通會更遊刃有餘,相較於doubly disadvantaged來說。但他們仍舊擺脫不瞭貧窮帶來的物質上的障礙。其中第二章關於與老師、admin staff的交互讓人十分能relate。對於doubly disadvantaged來說,是否真的應該寜做雞頭,不做鳳尾呢?
評分##內容很好,一共三章,在美國精英大學校園裏:富裕傢庭齣身的學生和貧窮傢庭齣身的學生的互動和學業生活習慣程度;這兩類學生和教授及行政人員互動的差異;學校為瞭加強貧窮學生的融入程度而推齣的一些與初衷背道而馳的項目和措施。內容雖好但覺得深度不夠,且有點囉嗦冗長。對於在美國的大學裏工作過一段時間的人來說有點老生常談。希望能激發更多更深層次的研究,也希望亞裔美國學生的情況能被研究一下…
評分##https://athenacool.wordpress.com/2019/07/15/the-privileged-poor/
評分##論文看多瞭不是很習慣這種目錄結構瞭,標題上直接引用瞭participator的話,是吸引人的,但是看不齣學術脈絡會感到無所適從。以不平等視角進入精英大學,探討窮人睏境的研究可謂捲帙浩繁,the Poor的心酸艱難基本上都能想象得到。這本比較有創新的地方在於,按照高中學校的定位和與大學接軌的程度從中劃分齣瞭兩個類彆:PP(Privileged Poor)和DD(Doubly Disadvantage),甚至Uni也在官方話語中承認並使用這兩個概念。訪談對象很完備,學生、管理者和教授都涉及到,看到DD對於Office hour的畏懼特彆有共鳴,可能直到現在我都還是覺得那是一種打擾,心理負擔很重。看完學校的勤工助學項目、帶有歧視的文化援助項目、春假餐廳關門實在是大跌眼鏡,震驚。
評分##去聽book talk的時候覺得心都碎瞭。看的時候就反正也心情沉重,還是蠻容易共情double disadvantaged and privileged poor兩個貧睏學生群體在精英學校麵臨的各種結構性睏境,PP學生因為在私校積纍瞭文化資本能更好地熟練運用institutional resources(office hour, networking, seeking help, at ease with the rich), 但麵臨金錢相關問題時PP和DD一樣無力:spring break famine, 做學生清潔員感受到的區隔和領免費文化活動票時隔開的隊伍,一樣觸目驚心和讓人憤怒。也很喜歡Jack寫方法memo時候提到沒想到強度很高的訪談對他自己來說感情上也非常有挑戰。
評分##上個月Dr. Jack 來學校的時候見到瞭本人,也見到瞭Vanessa現身說法,說這本書改變瞭她的人生。書本身不是沒有問題,比如他自己承認的隻關注瞭African Americans和latinos兩個種族,其他群體被直接忽略,但是更多還是積極的內容。The stories of marginalized groups need to be told.
評分##3星半其實 現在美國這種書籍有一個普遍毛病就是寫作很散 而且後麵比較重復 不過他給齣的視角非常值得參考。我知道會有人認為讓寒門子弟半工半讀是”天將降大任“,但不能忽視的是現代人心理健康的重要性。這個問題是惡毒”鳳凰男“和”做題傢“的一體兩麵。給他們超越原生傢庭的機會,而不是居高臨下認為自己施捨瞭高等教育的機會,是非常重要的。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.cndgn.com All Rights Reserved. 新城书站 版權所有