改革新蓝图（2013-2020）（英文版） [China: Embracing the Market Economy 2.0] pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

新京报 著

图书标签:

• China
• Economic Reform
• Market Economy
• Policy
• Development
• 2013-2020
• China's Economy
• Political Economy
• Globalization
• Innovation

出版社： 五洲传播出版社

ISBN：9787508526898

版次：1

商品编码：11515060

包装：平装

外文名称：China: Embracing the Market Economy 2.0

开本：16开

出版时间：2014-03-01

用纸：纯质纸

页数：159

正文语种：英文

编辑推荐

《改革新蓝图》一书包括著名经济学者吴敬琏、成思危、林毅夫、迟福林对十八届三中全会后中国经济改革的展望；针对中国未来十年预期，对中国经济学家和公众展开的问卷调查总结；还包括张维迎、辜胜阻、王健林等二十六位经济学家、企业家对中国未来经济趋势的预测。内容全面，对中国经济的发展做了较为全面的把握。

This book has the well-known Chinese economists Wu Jinglian, Cheng Siwei, Lin Yifu, and Chi Fulin on China’s economic reform after the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee. Also include the prediction for the future economy by 30 economists and entrepreneurs such as Zhang Weiying, Gu Shengzu and Wang Jianlin.

内容简介

《改革新蓝图》一书包括著名经济学者吴敬琏、成思危、林毅夫、迟福林对十八届三中全会后中国经济改革的展望；针对中国未来十年预期，对中国经济学家和公众展开的问卷调查总结；还包括张维迎、辜胜阻、王健林等二十六位经济学家、企业家对中国未来经济趋势的预测。内容全面，对中国经济的发展做了较为全面的把握。

The Third Plenary Session of 18th CPC Central Committee pointed out that in order to realize the Chinese dream of the great renewal of Chinese nation, we must deepen the all-round reform at a new historic starting point, the key of which is economic structural reform. The Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee pointed out that we must deepen economic reform focusing on the major issue that market must play a decisive role in resource allocation, and we must stick to and improve the basic economic system, improve modern market system, speed up the improvement of modern market system, macro-economic regulation system, and open economic system, accelerate the transformation of economic growth mode, set up an innovative country to develop a more efficient, more fair and more sustainable economy. This reform is a new starting point of China’s market economic construction, at which the CPC Central Committee draws a blueprint for China’s economic development.

作者简介

新京报是光明日报主管、光明日报和南方日报两大报业集团联合主办的综合类大型城市日报，是中国一家获正式批准的跨地区联合办报试点，也是中国一家股份制结构的时政类报纸。

The Beijing News was established in Beijing on November 11, 2003. It enjoys the reputation of a widely influential cosmopolitan newspaper focusing mainly on reporting current affairs.

目录

CONTENTS

The beginning of economic reform in a new era

Anticipate a market economy of “version 2.0”

Deal with the relationship between the government and the market

China is expected to be a high-income country in 2020

Adjustment of interest structure is the key to reform

Economist: the biggest dividend comes from reform in the next decade

Reform of leading team deserves expectation

Let private capital exert catfish effect in financial reform

Property tax is not suitable for China’s national conditions

Growth of the housing price will slow down in 2014

Retail industry undergoes the third reform

China’s economic future depends on reform

Mobile devices will be everywhere

Anti-corruption should rely on system reform

The growth rate of e-commerce will be far more than GDP

Growth is expected to maintain 8% in future

There is a huge bonus space in reform

Decline in economic growth is a necessary price

Demographic debt always after the demographic dividend

Entrepreneurs will enter a period of great changes

The benefits of China’s (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone will be clear in half a year

Internet finance is the theme of 2014

Government should use fewer economic stimulus policies

Reducing housing vacancy rate can temper price

Improvement of China’s wealth transparency

Focus of urbanization: Clearing the institutional obstacle

Urgency of the reform of income distribution

Booming budget airlines

Decentralization is the reform highlight in 2013

Investment efficiency of state-owned enterprises should be improved urgently

The dust in electric business platform competition does not fall

More enterprises to enter the agriculture is a good thing

The Decision on Major Issues Concerning Comprehensively Deepening Reforms in brief

精彩书摘

Property tax is not suitable for China’s

national conditions

Xu Shanda

Xu Shanda, the former deputy director of China’s State Administration of Taxation, holds many offices and he has ever been an enterprise employee, researcher, and a government official. Now he is devoted to tax reform.

As a firm opponent of property tax, facing questions, he responded that his practice should not be simply taken as speaking for the rich; concerning property issues, he firstly becomes the spokesman of the lowincome group.

A science and technology graduate with good logic thinking as he is, he prefers humanity history to natural scenery and has a taste for works of arts.

Lately, he wrote an article in Century Tide to review the political wisdom of former Premier Zhu Rongji in fiscal and taxation reform in 1993. A comment of this article by Zhu Rongji said that, “vivid scene of that year leaps from the page”.

Property tax has not been approved by local governments

Q: You opposed the imposition of property tax on residential house before, but now what’s your opinion?

Xu: It has been four years since property tax was put forth. After four years’ implementation, it is proved that the property tax should not be levied. Now the pilot places for property tax are Shanghai and Chongqing, China. But until now, Shanghai municipal government has never mentioned its successful pilot of property tax, even if Chongqing mayor Huang Qifan has ever indicated the pilot is very successful in Chongqing, but the collection range there is narrowed down year by year.

In 2011, the taxable price for high-end homes was 9941 RMB per square meter; in 2012, it was changed to 12152 RMB per square meter; in 2013, a new standard of it is 12779 RMB per square meter. In three years of piloting, property tax threshold is increased by 2838 RMB per square meter. It seems illogical conclusion that the pilot is successful, while the range of collection is narrowed year by year.

Meanwhile, except the two pilot cities, no local government volunteers to be the pilot place to levy property tax. On the contrary, upon being rumored to be the pilot place, many local governments will clarify the truth immediately. Such thing ever happened in areas such as Beijing, Shenzhen, Nanjing, Hangzhou, Hunan, and Hubei. We can see that almost no local governments approve property tax. When Shenzhen was rumored to be the pilot place, its mayor cleared with three sentences: if the central government has designated Shenzhen as the pilot place, we will do our best to carry out. But until now, we have not received any directive from the central government to levy property tax in Shenzhen. Finally, local government now has no pilot project in Shenzhen.

Property tax originally is local tax, but it is not approved by local governments, and practice has proved this to be true, because for many years no local government except the two pilot places is willing to levy property tax.

Q: Why?

Xu: Originally, there are three objectives in the pilot to reform property tax. The first objective is to increase local government revenue, but now we can see that it doesn’t make any difference to it, because the property tax income for governments in Shanghai and Chongqing is not decent, let alone, this taxation can deal with revenue problems of local governments. The second objective is to reduce China’s household income gap, but practice proves that it doesn’t work. The third objective is to lower housing price, but the fact is that obviously the housing price in Shanghai and Chongqing is rising, rather than decreasing.

The above are the three objectives proposed by proponent to pilot property tax, but none of the three objectives has been realized, so it is not unreasonable that local governments are not willing to pilot property tax. So I don’t agree to enlarge pilot area for property tax, on the contrary, I think that this practice should be stopped in the two pilot places. Collecting residential property tax is unsuitable to the conditions in China.

前言/序言

The beginning of economic reform in a new era

It is clear that China’s market economic construction has come to a new start. At this juncture, by convention, the Beijing News tries to look into China’s economic future at the end of the year.

The Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee responded to the market’s expectation on reform. In the Third Plenum Communique, the word “reform” has been mentioned 59 times, far more than ever before, which shows the difficulty, urgency and determination of reform.

Where should the reform start from? Opinions vary. This conference responded to this by putting forth 15 key points of reform such as “Improving modern market system”, which declared the start of economic reform in a new era. To be more specific, looking ahead, we expect to have China’s market economy system further updated, and this expectation is worthwhile.

It was in 1994, when the Third Plenary Session of the 14th CPC Central Committee was held, that China’s market economic system began to be established. After 20 years’ development, the dividends of the new economic system have undoubtedly benefited the great majority of Chinese people and profoundly transformed the structure of the world economy. Though in the last 20 years many problems have accumulated in the process of China’s marketization process, and tremendous differences exist among people benefiting from reform, yet it is believed that China’s move to market economy is irreversible. Therefore, it is urgently required that we should resolve problems in reform with greater determination and start the new era of reform.

By looking back, we can say that the construction of China’s market economy in the past 20 years is the fundamental cause underlying China’s continuously rapid growth to the world second largest economy; however, we cannot deny that the rapid growth is not only the dividends from transition into market system, but also closely related to the “dividends from globalization” as China has joined the WTO and has been actively involved in the world economic system. The world gradually becomes “flat” for China with fading advantage of backwardness. It is a top priority to begin updating the imperfect market economic system.

To update, we need to face up to the problems existing in the current market economic system and deal with them one by one.

To sum up, though the old planned economic system has been transformed into the market economic system, the remains of the former one are still hindering market-oriented reform.

For example, in our economy, we can see that planned economy still prevails but takes “review and approval” as a cover-up. Review and approval still exists for a grand aim that has never been achieved; much worse, it has become a means to rent-seeking. For example, the construction of every steel mill should go through a series of review and approval, but the result of this is that we set up a market with overcapacity. Another example is that, from the central government to the local governments, a specific plan for the industry is made, but at times, we are faced with the reality that the industrial structure should be readjusted. But we rarely meet such troubles in less-regulated industries.

One reason for these problems is that the role of market in resource allocation is restricted to some extent, and the relation between market and government is not well coordinated. Another reason is that market in China is still not unified.

In the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, the top priority of economic system reform has been pointed out clearly that we should strike a balance between the role of the government and that of the market and make sure that market plays a decisive role in resource allocation so as to set up a unified and open market system with orderly competition. This response is also a conclusive rescue to the ills of China’s market economic system over the past 20 years. In that sense, we should give due respect to market and get it to play its role deserved and operate openly under the rule of laws. All this is a starting point to update China’s economic system.

Take Chinese economist Wu Jinglian’s word, we can say that previous market economic system in China is an old 1.0 version, whereas after the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee the version has been updated to 2.0 version, under which the property rights should be protected adequately, prices should be very open, government’s right to manage market should be clearly defined, monopoly and local protectionism should be eliminated, and private capital and state-owned capital should be equally treated.

In order to achieve these aims, we must “properly deal with the relation between the government and market” just as has been pointed out in the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee. As to the relation between government and market, the former should decentralize its power to the latter. In addition, it has been declared in this session that we must unswervingly strengthen and develop the public economy, and also unswervingly encourage, support and guide the development of the non-public economy, and treat state capital and private capital alike. All these measures are the indispensable steps to update market economic system.

This Third Plenary Session can be regarded as a blueprint for China to deepen all-round reform. But the so-called blueprint is just a starting point in our new journey of economic reform.

Chief editor of Economic Information Department of the Beijing

News

Wang Haitao

《改革新蓝图（2013-2020）》（英文版） 引言 2013年至2020年，是中国经济社会发展历程中一段至关重要的时期。在此七年间，中国以前所未有的决心和力度，开启了一场深刻的、全方位的改革。这场改革并非对既往政策的简单延续，而是一次对发展模式的再思考、对体制机制的再优化、对国家治理能力的再提升，其核心在于构建一个更加成熟、更具活力的社会主义市场经济体制，为中国未来的可持续发展奠定坚实基础。本书《改革新蓝图（2013-2020）》（英文版），旨在深入剖析这一时期中国改革的战略部署、关键举措及其深远影响，为理解中国经济的转型升级、社会治理的创新以及中国在全球格局中的角色演变提供一个全面的视角。 第一部分：顶层设计的战略基石——十八届三中全会的深远影响 2013年11月，中国共产党第十八届中央委员会第三次全体会议（简称“十八届三中全会”）召开，通过了《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》。这份文件被誉为“改革新蓝图”，它系统性地回答了“中国向何处去”、“如何改革”等根本性问题，为未来七年的改革指明了方向，奠定了战略基石。 1. 坚持和完善社会主义基本经济制度，使市场在资源配置中起决定性作用和更好发挥政府作用。 这是十八届三中全会最核心、最具突破性的论断。它明确了市场在经济活动中的主导地位，要求最大限度地发挥市场机制的活力，释放经济发展的潜能。同时，也强调了政府的“更好发挥作用”，这意味着政府的角色将从直接干预转向优化营商环境、维护市场公平、提供公共服务等方面，构建一个更加高效、有序的市场生态。 2. 深化经济体制改革。 文件着力于破解经济发展中的深层矛盾和体制性障碍。 要素市场化配置改革： 重点在于破除阻碍生产要素（如劳动力、资本、土地、技术、数据）自由流动的体制机制弊端，提高要素配置效率，激发全社会创造力。例如，农村土地制度改革、户籍制度改革、金融市场改革等都在此框架下展开。 混合所有制经济发展： 强调要毫不动摇巩固和发展公有制经济，毫不动摇鼓励、支持、引导非公有制经济发展。推动国有企业混合所有制改革，鼓励各类资本参与国有企业改革，形成股权多元化、治理机制灵活的市场主体，提升国有经济活力和竞争力。 财税体制改革： 健全中央和地方财力事权相匹配的财政体制，推进税收法定，健全地方税体系，完善转移支付制度，优化财政资源配置，减轻企业和居民负担。 金融体制改革： 深化利率市场化改革，推进人民币国际化，健全金融机构治理，有效防范和化解金融风险，更好地服务实体经济。 3. 深化行政体制改革。 旨在转变政府职能，简政放权，优化政府结构，提高行政效率。 简政放权： 大力削减行政审批事项，取消不必要的证明和盖章，最大限度地挤压寻租空间，激发市场主体活力。 优化政府职责体系和组织结构： 推进机构改革，整合职能相近的部门，理顺职责关系，避免多头管理和职责交叉。 建设服务型政府： 强调政府的公共服务职能，提升政府治理能力和公共服务水平，满足人民日益增长的美好生活需要。 4. 深化司法体制改革。 旨在建设公正高效权威的社会主义司法制度，维护社会公平正义。 健全司法权力运行机制： 明确司法权力的边界，防止权力滥用，保障司法独立性。 完善以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度： 提高侦查、起诉、审判的衔接性，保障当事人的诉讼权利。 深化案件管理制度改革： 提高司法效率，减轻当事人诉累。 5. 深化文化体制改革。 旨在建设社会主义文化强国，激发文化创新创造活力。 健全现代公共文化服务体系： 满足人民群众日益增长的文化需求。 推动文化产业繁荣发展： 鼓励文化产品和服务创新，提升文化产业竞争力。 健全文化市场体系： 规范文化市场秩序，促进文化交流互鉴。 6. 深化社会体制改革。 旨在建设公平正义、民主法治、安定有序的社会。 健全促进就业的体制机制： 健全覆盖全民、统筹城乡、公平统一、安全规范、可持续的多层次社会保障体系。 健全基本公共服务体系： 促进教育、医疗、养老等基本公共服务均等化。 健全城乡发展一体化体制机制： 促进城乡要素流动，缩小城乡差距。 7. 深化生态文明体制改革。 旨在建设美丽中国，实现经济发展与环境保护的协同。 健全自然资源产权制度： 明确自然资源的所有权和使用权。 健全生态保护补偿制度： 建立生态补偿机制，激励生态保护。 健全环境治理体系： 加强环境污染防治，提升生态环境质量。 8. 深化国防和军队改革。 旨在建设一支强大的现代化军队，维护国家主权、安全和发展利益。 推进联合作战指挥体制改革： 提高军队的联合作战能力。 构建中国特色现代军事力量体系： 优化军事结构，提升军事现代化水平。 9. 健全党的建设制度。 强调坚持和改善党的领导，提高党的执政能力和领导水平，为改革提供坚强的政治保证。 第二部分：改革的重点领域与关键举措（2013-2020） 在十八届三中全会精神的指引下，2013年至2020年期间，中国在多个关键领域推出了具有里程碑意义的改革举措，这些举措既是对顶层设计蓝图的具体落实，也对中国经济社会发展产生了深远影响。 1. 经济发展模式的转型升级： 供给侧结构性改革： 2015年底，中央经济工作会议首次提出供给侧结构性改革，将去产能、去库存、去杠杆、降成本、补短板作为主攻方向。这一改革旨在解决经济发展中长期存在的结构性问题，推动经济发展从要素驱动向创新驱动转变。 “放管服”改革深化： “简政放权、放管结合、优化服务”改革持续深化，大幅削减行政审批事项，优化营商环境，激发市场主体活力。例如，“证照分离”改革、全程网上审批等措施的推广，极大地便利了企业注册和运营。 创新驱动发展战略： 加大科技创新投入，建设国家实验室，推动关键核心技术攻关，深化科技体制改革，激发全社会创新创业活力。大众创业、万众创新成为时代潮流。 对外开放新格局： 积极推进“一带一路”倡议，拓展国际合作空间；设立自贸试验区，探索制度创新，打造更高水平的对外开放新局面；推动人民币国际化，构建更加开放的金融体系。 2. 社会治理体系的现代化： 平安中国建设： 加强社会治安综合治理，维护社会稳定，构建和谐社会。 法治中国建设： 推进依法治国，健全法治体系，提高依法执政、依法行政、依法办事水平。 社会保障体系建设： 持续推进社会保障制度改革，扩大覆盖面，提高保障水平，健全多层次社会保障体系。 健康中国战略： 深化医药卫生体制改革，推动分级诊疗，加强公共卫生体系建设，提高人民健康水平。 3. 生态文明建设的里程碑： 环保督察常态化： 建立并实施中央环保督察制度，有效解决了一批突出环境问题，有力推动了地方政府的环保责任落实。 生态文明制度体系建设： 健全自然资源资产产权制度，推进生态环境损害赔偿制度改革，建立生态保护红线制度，将环境保护纳入经济社会发展评价体系。 绿色发展理念深入人心： 推动能源结构优化，发展清洁能源，推广绿色生产方式和生活方式，建设美丽中国。 4. 党的自我革命与全面从严治党： 反腐败斗争： 持续推进反腐败斗争，坚持“老虎”、“苍蝇”一起打，形成不敢腐、不能腐、不想腐的体制机制。 党内政治生活： 强调严肃党内政治生活，加强党性修养，提高党的执政能力和领导水平。 制度建设： 健全党内监督制度，完善权力运行制约和监督机制。 第三部分：改革的成效与影响 2013年至2020年的改革，是中国经济社会发展史上浓墨重彩的一笔，其成效体现在多个层面： 经济高质量发展取得显著进展： 经济结构不断优化，新动能加快成长，创新驱动作用日益凸显，经济发展质量和效益显著提升。 市场活力和社会创造力得到极大激发： 简政放权、优化营商环境等改革措施，降低了市场准入门槛，激发了各类市场主体的活力，为经济增长注入了新的动力。 人民生活水平显著提高： 居民收入持续增长，脱贫攻坚取得历史性成就，教育、医疗、养老等基本公共服务体系不断完善，人民群众的获得感、幸福感、安全感显著增强。 生态环境持续改善： 绿色发展理念深入人心，污染防治取得积极成效，人民群众对优美生态环境的期待得到更好满足。 国家治理体系和治理能力现代化水平不断提升： 改革的系统性、整体性、协同性增强，为实现国家长治久安提供了制度保障。 中国国际地位和影响力显著提升： 更加开放的中国为世界经济增长注入了新动力，中国在全球治理中的作用日益凸显。 结语 《改革新蓝图（2013-2020）》（英文版）并非仅仅是对过往政策的简单回顾，而是对中国在深刻变革时期所展现出的战略远见、改革决心和治理智慧的深刻解读。这一时期的改革，是中国经济社会发展进入新常态、迈向高质量发展的关键时期，它不仅塑造了今天的中国，也为未来的中国发展奠定了坚实的基础。本书的出版，希望能帮助读者更深入地理解中国改革的逻辑、动力与方向，从而更全面地认识正在发生的中国。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

从纯粹的学术阅读体验来看，这本书的翻译质量和注释的详尽程度，直接决定了其作为英文版读物的价值。如果它旨在面向国际读者阐释中国复杂的改革逻辑，那么语言的精确性和概念的清晰度就显得尤为重要。我希望译者不仅是简单地将中文术语对译，而是能真正捕捉到那些带有中国特定政治经济含义的词汇，并提供恰当的解释，确保西方读者能够理解其深层次的含义，避免“翻译陷阱”。例如，像“简政放权”或“混合所有制”这类词汇，在不同的文化语境下很容易产生歧义。一本优秀的国际视野下的学术著作，应该致力于充当一座跨文化的桥梁，用清晰、严谨的逻辑引导读者进入一个复杂的体系。因此，对书中引用的官方文件、专家访谈的来源标注，以及对关键术语的背景介绍，我都非常看重，因为它们构成了支撑起整个“蓝图”论述的坚实地基。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

这本书的英文译名，[China: Embracing the Market Economy 2.0]，本身就提出了一个极具挑战性的命题：如果说1.0是邓小平时代的“摸着石头过河”，那么2.0版本又意味着什么？这不仅仅是量的积累，更可能是质的飞跃或路径的根本性调整。我个人对于这种“升级换代”的论述非常感兴趣。它暗示着中国经济体制的演进不再是简单的修补或微调，而是需要一套全新的理论框架和操作指南来指导。我希望能从书中看到对“新常态”下，要素市场化、政府职能转变、国有企业改革等核心议题的深入剖析。更重要的是，这种“2.0”的提法，是否意味着在某些领域，中国正在尝试跳出传统西方经济学的范式，构建一套具有自身特色的、更具适应性的现代化路径？这种跨越式的理论建构，往往是理解一个国家未来走向的钥匙。它要求作者具备极强的理论功底和敏锐的现实洞察力，才能描绘出这一宏大叙事的清晰轮廓。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

作为一个长期关注区域发展和产业政策的读者，我对书中可能涉及的地方政府行为和产业集群发展的内容抱有极大的期待。改革的落地，最终要体现在每一块土地上的投资决策和资源配置中。我希望这本书能够提供一些具体的案例研究，展示在新的政策导向下，哪些地区成为了改革的先行者，他们采用了哪些创新的治理模式来激发市场活力。例如，在供给侧结构性改革的浪潮中，传统重工业基地是如何实现凤凰涅槃的？高新技术产业的爆发式增长背后，政府的引导基金和监管框架又扮演了何种微妙的角色？这些细节，往往是宏观经济数据无法完全捕捉到的。一本好的改革史，不应该只是高层会议的记录，更应该是无数企业家的汗水和地方官员的智慧交织而成的复杂织物。我期待这本书能够提供这种多维度的视角，让读者能够感受到改革的“温度”和“力度”。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

阅读涉及国家宏观战略的书籍时，一个常常被忽视但至关重要的方面是其国际语境的嵌入性。2013到2020年间，全球地缘政治的紧张局势与贸易保护主义的抬头，对中国的改革进程无疑构成了巨大的外部压力。因此，我非常关注书中对“双循环”战略的早期酝酿和部署是否有深入的探讨。改革的蓝图，绝不可能是在真空里绘制的，它必然是对外部不确定性的主动回应和战略预判。这本书是否能清晰地阐释，在外部环境趋紧的背景下，内部改革的节奏和侧重点是如何调整的？特别是在金融开放和人民币国际化方面，外部的冲击是否加速了某些内部改革的步伐？这种内外部因素的交互作用，是理解中国经济韧性的关键所在。我期待作者能提供一种动态的、辩证的视角，而不是将内部改革视为一个孤立的进程，而是将其置于全球化与逆全球化角力的宏大棋局中进行考察。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

这部著作的标题，光是“改革新蓝图”这几个字，就勾勒出了一幅波澜壮阔的历史画卷，让人不禁联想到那个风云激荡的年代。我记得我拿到这本书的时候，正值对中国经济转型期充满好奇和探索欲的时候。这本书的厚度，以及封面上那种沉稳、略带历史感的字体设计，都暗示着其中蕴含着深刻的洞见与详实的资料。我之所以被它吸引，首先是因为它聚焦于一个极其关键的时间窗口——2013年到2020年，这不仅是中国深化改革进入攻坚期的关键阶段，也是全球经济格局发生深刻变化的重要时期。作者显然没有满足于宏观叙事，而是试图穿透那些官方报告的表层，去探究在具体政策制定和执行层面，究竟有哪些“新蓝图”在被绘制和描摹。我期待看到的是，作者如何巧妙地平衡了顶层设计与基层实践之间的关系，那些宏大的战略构想是如何在复杂的现实土壤中生根发芽，又遇到了哪些意想不到的阻力或催化剂。这种对过程的细致描摹，远比单纯的结果展示更引人入胜，因为它揭示了决策背后的逻辑链条和人性博弈。